[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: version numbering

On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 00:52 +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Lars Bahner <bahner@debian.org> [2005.08.18.2346 +0200]:
> > Please CC: me as I am not on this list!
> Please consider setting Mail-Followup-To accordingly.
> > Upstream names the betas for as - as you no
> > doubt already guessed.
> This is why we now have the ~ operator.
> > So now that there is no beta-versioning, the installer sees this
> > as a lower number. I could of cource number the package as
> > or, but I was wondering what The Right
> > Thing To Do would be.
> I think you have to resort to an epoch. Using seems
> okay to me too. I don't think there is a Right Way.

I think the ~ is the Right Way. < <

GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: