[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: version numbering

also sprach Lars Bahner <bahner@debian.org> [2005.08.18.2346 +0200]:
> Please CC: me as I am not on this list!

Please consider setting Mail-Followup-To accordingly.

> Upstream names the betas for as - as you no
> doubt already guessed.

This is why we now have the ~ operator.

> So now that there is no beta-versioning, the installer sees this
> as a lower number. I could of cource number the package as
> or, but I was wondering what The Right
> Thing To Do would be.

I think you have to resort to an epoch. Using seems
okay to me too. I don't think there is a Right Way.

Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 .''`.     martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :'  :    proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
Invalid/expired PGP (sub)keys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
the english take english for granted.
but if we explore its paradoxes,
we find that quicksand can work slowly.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)

Reply to: