also sprach Lars Bahner <email@example.com> [2005.08.18.2346 +0200]: > Please CC: me as I am not on this list! Please consider setting Mail-Followup-To accordingly. > Upstream names the betas for 0.7.3.3 as 0.7.3.3.b1-b30 - as you no > doubt already guessed. This is why we now have the ~ operator. > So now that there is no beta-versioning, the installer sees this > as a lower number. I could of cource number the package as > 0.7.3.3.c or 0.7.3.3.final, but I was wondering what The Right > Thing To Do would be. I think you have to resort to an epoch. Using 0.7.3.3.final seems okay to me too. I don't think there is a Right Way. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <firstname.lastname@example.org> : :' : proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP (sub)keys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! the english take english for granted. but if we explore its paradoxes, we find that quicksand can work slowly.
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)