[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: arch, svn, cvs

also sprach Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> [2005.08.20.2100 +0200]:
> arch-pqm still requires that people publish their own repositories.

Yeah, that it still a problem which resources like arch.debian.org
should deal with, a little better at least. I can't find the link
now, but I've also heard of an arch aggregator that would process
changesets sent by email.

There is definitely (a lot of) work to be done in this area.

Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 .''`.     martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :'  :    proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
Invalid/expired PGP (sub)keys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
"a scientist once wrote that all truth passes through three stages:
 first it is ridiculed, then violently opposed and eventually,
 accepted as self-evident."
                                                       -- schopenhauer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)

Reply to: