[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: arch, svn, cvs (was: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security)

On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 02:33:31PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Marc Haber <mh+debian-devel@zugschlus.de> [2005.08.19.1422 +0200]:
> > Compared to SVN from the view of somebody who is acquainted with CVS,
> > arch sucks badly. I tend to agree with most of the things that Florian
> > Weimer lists on http://www.enyo.de/fw/software/arch/design-issues.html
> I won't go through the trouble to compile the extensive list of
> problems and design issues with SVN.

OK.  Then please just name two or three.  I am geniunely interested.  I
switched from CVS to subversion exclusively for my own use when Sarge
went stable.  I still use CVS occasionally since some projects to which
I contribute use CVS (e.g., on sourceforge).


Roberto C. Sanchez

Attachment: pgp9wNXyU3P2y.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: