Re: Dogme05: Team Maintenance
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 06:14 +0000, W. Borgert wrote:
> Some of the things under Dogme05 is certainly exaggeration.
> Sorry, if people thought I want to propose enforcement of "team
> maintenance policy". However, team maintenance for all
> essential and standard is worthwhile and not un-realistic.
Well, you did say "all packages". If you had talked explicitly only
about essential and standard packages, you would have heard no
complaints from me.
> > "HA-ing". I'm sorry. I don't know what you mean.
> Sorry, we may have to many abbreviation based verbs already, so
> I should not invent new ones: HA = high availability.
Thanks for the secret TLA decoder ring.