Re: libxslt1 / libxslt1.1 clean-up, comments welcome
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 07:41:08PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Now that no package depend on it, I am going to remove it, but that
> leaves a libxslt1.1 package alone, not really respectful of the debian
> standards for package naming.
How is it not respectful of Debian standards for package naming?
> So, what do you think ? Should I just leave it the way it is now or try
> to make it cleaner ?
Are there any functional or practical reasons to change the package name
back to libxslt1? If not, I don't see any need to change it.
--
gram
Reply to: