On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 07:08:55PM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote: > >On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 04:23:55PM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote: > >> well, sometime bugs get all the way to stable, no software is without > >>bugs. What I was talking about is that 'unstable' is pretty much only > >>usable desktop > >Clearly not, or you wouldn't find it necessary to complain about the fact > >that you currently find it unusable. > come on, don't pretend you don't understand (also, I didn't say I > find it unusable, I am mostly trying to figure out what's going on with > jackd). > clarification: unstable is _closest_ to usable desktop out of what > debian offers. > and it would be really nice if developers wouldn't break it > unneccessarily, like jackd seems to be doing right now. I am not > complaining about occasional problems (like e.g. x.org upgrade) or > really huge efforts like c++ abi change (I think jackd problem is not > part of that but I might be mistaken). You are mistaken. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature