[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: status of jackd? (bug #318098)

On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 07:08:55PM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> >On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 04:23:55PM -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:

> >> well, sometime bugs get all the way to stable, no software is without 
> >>bugs. What I was talking about is that 'unstable' is pretty much only 
> >>usable desktop

> >Clearly not, or you wouldn't find it necessary to complain about the fact
> >that you currently find it unusable.

>   come on, don't pretend you don't understand (also, I didn't say I 
> find it unusable, I am mostly trying to figure out what's going on with 
> jackd).

>   clarification: unstable is _closest_ to usable desktop out of what 
> debian offers.

>   and it would be really nice if developers wouldn't break it 
> unneccessarily, like jackd seems to be doing right now. I am not 
> complaining about occasional problems (like e.g. x.org upgrade) or 
> really huge efforts like c++ abi change (I think jackd problem is not 
> part of that but I might be mistaken).

You are mistaken.

Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: