[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: jack transition status notes

On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 11:45:48AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Nathanael Nerode [Thu, 04 Aug 2005 04:28:44 -0400]:

> > Ugh.  Isn't there some other way?

>   Having britney do partial library upgrades (i.e, not remove the old
>   package/soname from testing when letting the new version in; but make
>   sure the old one gets removed before release).

>   Don't ask me more about it. I've only heard a couple times about it,
>   but have no idea whether it's going to be implemented or not, or if it
>   would cause other problems as well.

Yes, AFAIK everyone is in agreement that this should be implemented, it's
just a question of getting code that does the right thing.

Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: