Re: Packages descriptions review

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Packages descriptions review
From: Anthony DeRobertis <anthony@derobert.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:30:51 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 42EC1BBB.2070703@derobert.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1122444913.7085.5.camel@localhost>
References: <[🔎] 1122404123.642.13.camel@localhost> <[🔎] 42E6CD4F.9010009@derobert.net> <[🔎] 1122444913.7085.5.camel@localhost>

One more question: Was the question, should short descriptions be
capitalized? ever decided?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Packages descriptions review
  - From: Clément Stenac <zorglub@diwi.org>
- Re: Packages descriptions review
  - From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org>

References:
- Packages descriptions review
  - From: Clément Stenac <zorglub@diwi.org>
- Re: Packages descriptions review
  - From: Anthony DeRobertis <anthony@derobert.net>
- Re: Packages descriptions review
  - From: Clément Stenac <zorglub@diwi.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Packages descriptions review
Next by Date: Re: Bug#320623: ITP: monouml -- computer-aided software engineering (CASE) friendly tool
Previous by thread: Re: Packages descriptions review
Next by thread: Re: Packages descriptions review
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread