Re: The BTS and bug subscriptions
Florian Weimer <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> * Goswin von Brederlow:
>>> What has actually been discussed is automatically subscribing
>>> submitters to the bug report unless some special header/pseudo-header
>>> is added to prevent that. [It's possible that this subscription would
>>> happen without even needing to confirm the subscription... but that's
>>> still undecided.]
>> That would subscribe every spam the BTS recieves. Very bad I think.
> Even if we restrict it to initial submitters?
Not subscribing the initial submitter would be insane and subscribing
him is already the current way. So there would be no change to