Re: Removal of transitional dummy packages
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 10353 March 1977, Santiago Vila wrote:
> >> we need to remove
> >> from the archive all the Woody-to-Sarge transition dummy packages.
> > No, that's not true, we don't *need* to remove woody-to-sarge dummy
> > packages, as they are also woody-to-etch dummy packages.
> We do not support that.
There is no "we" here. You don't want to support them for your packages?
Fine, they are your packages, but I support them for my packages (see
Bug #312336 for example). So there is no "we".