[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal

On Thursday 14 July 2005 17:14, Junichi Uekawa wrote:

> The current recommendation I'm trying to give is:
> Package: libXXXNNNN-dev
> Conflicts: libXXX-dev
> Provides: libXXX-dev
> Thus, it won't contradict with your requirement to
> be able to just build-depend on libXXX-dev.

I may be wrong, but I thought it was incorrect to build-dep only on a pure 
virtual package? e.g.:

Build-Depend: xlibmesa-gl-dev | libgl-dev

Reply to: