Re: shared library -dev package naming proposal
[I am stopping the cross-posting to -release, as -release is no
On 2005-07-14 Junichi Uekawa <email@example.com> wrote:
> I'd like to propose, for new -dev packages, to
> name -dev packages after their runtime library counterparts.
> If the library package is named lib$NAME,
> call the -dev package lib$NAME-dev.
The obvious downside of this is that the name of dev-package will change
although the API did not necessarily change. This would increase
workload for stuff like the current C++ transition and makes backporting