> Sory that you get the mail twice now, martin, I accidentally sent
> the first one to you instead of the list -.-
Here's my (also) personal reply:
also sprach Michael Weyershäuser <thedude0001@gmx.de> [2005.07.07.1431 +0200]:
> I guess you were refering to chapter 6 of the Developers Reference,
No, I was refering to the policy.
> "Best packaging practices", or something like that. However, the
> Debian Policy doesn't state what is supposed to be a good practice
> but definitely lays out the borders within which every maintainer
> has to stay...
Sure. But I am talking about changes. Those are not made and then
everyone is expected to abide by them. Instead, they are catalysed
from common and proven strategies.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :' : proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
never trust an operating system
for which you do not have the source.
-- source unknown
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature