* Martin Waitz (tali@admingilde.org) wrote: > hoi :) > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 12:18:19AM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote: > > The whole question is whether Debian can accept a Debian-specific > > agreement to call Firefox "Firefox". > > sure, and the consensus seems to be that there is no problem in > doing so. > > It's only you who doesn't want to accept that. Did you actually read the thread? I am not the only one who has a problem with this. It's quite possible mine is the minority opinion on the matter, but that does mean their is consensus. > You've done a great job in maintaining firefox, please don't > rename your package based on some personal differences with the > mozilla trademark policy. I don't have a personal difference with the trademark policy. Have you read it? It would not be possible for any Debian maintainer to work under its conditions. Now the question is whether we can accept a Debian-specific agreement to use the trademark. -- Eric Dorland <eric.dorland@mail.mcgill.ca> ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: hooty@jabber.com 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ G e h! r- y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature