Re: Upload new version of gaim-extendedprefs

To: Arjan Oosting <arjanoosting@home.nl>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Upload new version of gaim-extendedprefs
From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <jeroen@wolffelaar.nl>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 16:58:45 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20050627145845.GE2143@A-Eskwadraat.nl>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1119882174.5848.32.camel@stardust.arriesoft.nl>
References: <1119734388.21884.0.camel@stardust.arriesoft.nl> <20050627095622.GC18290@mx0.halon.org.uk> <[🔎] 1119879342.5848.21.camel@stardust.arriesoft.nl> <[🔎] 1119879959.6401.24.camel@localhost.localdomain> <[🔎] 1119882174.5848.32.camel@stardust.arriesoft.nl>

On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 04:22:54PM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote:
> But whether or not this is a good feature of CDBS, the real question is
> whether build dependencies on build-essential are only allowed when they
> are versioned? 

Well, they only make *sense* when versioned -- an unversioned depends
on all build essential packages is already implied by policy, and as
such it's only cruft on the build-depends line (but it doesn't hurt, so
it's merely a cosmetic issue).

--Jeroen

-- 
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Jeroen@wolffelaar.nl (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Upload new version of gaim-extendedprefs
  - From: Arjan Oosting <arjanoosting@home.nl>
- Re: Upload new version of gaim-extendedprefs
  - From: Ondrej Sury <ondrej@sury.org>
- Re: Upload new version of gaim-extendedprefs
  - From: Arjan Oosting <arjanoosting@home.nl>

Prev by Date: Re: problem with unstable -> testing package migration?
Next by Date: Re: problem with unstable -> testing package migration?
Previous by thread: Re: Upload new version of gaim-extendedprefs
Next by thread: Re: Upload new version of gaim-extendedprefs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread