On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 02:45:34AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > la, 2005-06-18 kello 22:53 -0400, Joey Hess kirjoitti: > > I want to run a test that installs each package in woody in turn, > > upgrades them to sarge, then to sid, then purges it, then looks for > > /usr/doc and /usr/info stuff that is were produced during the package's > > install or upgrade and not removed. > > I have now, I think, implemented something for this now. From the manual > page for version 0.5: > > 3. An upgrade test between Debian releases. This test is enabled > by using the -d option multiple times and disables the other two > tests. It sets up the chroot with the first distribution named, > then upgrades it to each successive one, and then remembers the > directory tree state at the end. After this, it starts over with > the chroot of the first distribution, installs the desired pack??? > ages (via apt-get), and does the successive upgrading (via > apt-get dist-upgrade). Then, if package files (and not just Hi Lars, A simple question. You mention that you use apt-get in this new testing environment. Would it be useful to allow an apt-get workalike(dpkg/aptitude/wajig)? The Sarge release notes mention that woody->sarge upgrade is best done with aptitude. So if you had tested an woody/stable->sarge/stable, would it not need to use aptitude as recommended by the release notes? Not sure if apt-get will be recommended for the next stable upgrade cycle. Is somebody working on making that so? Anyway thanks for the great new testing software. Cheers, Kev -- counter.li.org #238656 -- goto counter.li.org and be counted! `$' $' $ $ _ ,d$$$g$ ,d$$$b. $,d$$$b`$' g$$$$$b $,d$$b ,$P' `$ ,$P' `Y$ $$' `$ $ "' `$ $$' `$ $$ $ $$ggggg$ $ $ $ ,$P"" $ $ $ `$g. ,$$ `$$._ _. $ _,g$P $ `$b. ,$$ $ $ `Y$$P'$. `Y$$$$P $$$P"' ,$. `Y$$P'$ $. ,$.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature