[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Questions on how to handle this: [ftpmaster@debian.org: httperf_0.8-3_i386.changes REJECTED]



On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 10:12:01AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> "Roberto C. Sanchez" <roberto@familiasanchez.net>, wrote, on Friday, June
> 17, 2005 6:37 AM:
> 
> > Below I have included the text rejecting my httperf package.  I am
> > taking over as maintainer and uploaded a new version that also
> >closed a couple of bugs and moved it from non-US to main.  If linking
> > with libssl is not permissible, should the version that is currently in
> > Sarge be slated for removal when 3.1r1 comes out?
> 
> There is no httperf package in sarge, as there is no non-US archive for
> sarge, so the question is academic. As http://packages.debian.org/httperf
> shows, the package currently only exists in oldstable/non-US.
> 

Quite right.  I should really stay on top of these things :-)

-Roberto
-- 
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr

Attachment: pgpE7A3wcHcZJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: