Re: Let's remove octave2.0?
On 12 June 2005 at 21:13, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
| In #232777, Dirk Eddelbuettel and I had a discussion about octave2.0.
| Dirk wrote:
| > We should consider removing octave2.0 as well. It is old code , and
| > upstream decided years ago to not port this code branch, but to concentrate
| > on octave2.1 instead -- and octave2.1 is where all development has been for
| > quite some time.
| > I had planned to 'after stable is out'. I'll try to do a maintenance release
| > of 2.0.17. If that fails, I can still remove it.
| Do you think it should be removed now?
On 12 June 2005 at 21:14, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
| * Martin Michlmayr <email@example.com> [2005-06-12 21:13]:
| > Do you think it should be removed now?
| http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/05/msg00089.html lists some
| other octave related packages that should probably be removed.
Yes, if you look at my aggregates at
you see that the three packages octave2.0, octave-ci and octave-matcompat are
all slated to be removed. Jeroen reminded me regarding one of the three
last week, and I filed bug reports for the other two.
That concludes the Octave transfer from me over to the well-run pkg-octave
group at Alioth.
Thanks for the follow-up, though.
Statistics: The (futile) attempt to offer certainty about uncertainty.
-- Roger Koenker, 'Dictionary of Received Ideas of Statistics'