Let's remove octave2.0?
In #232777, Dirk Eddelbuettel and I had a discussion about octave2.0.
> We should consider removing octave2.0 as well. It is old code , and
> upstream decided years ago to not port this code branch, but to concentrate
> on octave2.1 instead -- and octave2.1 is where all development has been for
> quite some time.
> I had planned to 'after stable is out'. I'll try to do a maintenance release
> of 2.0.17. If that fails, I can still remove it.
Do you think it should be removed now?