Re: C++ ABI change -- freezing unstable for new C++ library packages
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 12:24:05PM +0100, Will Newton wrote:
> On Friday 10 June 2005 05:59, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > We're leaning towards possibly keeping udeb-generating packages frozen
> > during etch still because they require manual intervention for syncing
> > udebs into testing; this means separating the source packages that create
> > udebs (which as a class were frozen later) from the rest of the base
> > packages.
> I'm in the process of adopting a package (freetype2) that builds a udeb. Would
> updating this package now require manual intervention from the release team?
Yes, for the moment getting that into testing requires release-team
approval (which is unlikely to be withheld - it's just so that the udeb
can be synced at the same time).
Colin Watson [firstname.lastname@example.org]