Re: C++ ABI change -- freezing unstable for new C++ library packages
On Friday 10 June 2005 05:59, Steve Langasek wrote:
> We're leaning towards possibly keeping udeb-generating packages frozen
> during etch still because they require manual intervention for syncing
> udebs into testing; this means separating the source packages that create
> udebs (which as a class were frozen later) from the rest of the base
> packages.
I'm in the process of adopting a package (freetype2) that builds a udeb. Would
updating this package now require manual intervention from the release team?
Reply to: