Re: SCC (was Re: Canonical and Debian)
In article <[🔎] 20050607013619.GL18744@kitenet.net> you wrote:
> Copied from my blog:
> | The other suprising thing is that SCC seems to already be more a reality than
> | was thought, since it seems Debian's main Bulgarian and Slovenian mirrors, as
> | well as all of our Belarussian, Colombian, Israili, Indian, Moroccan and
> | Ukrainian mirrors, already carry only a subset of architectures. Indeed, 30%
> | of all our mirrors don't include all release architectures.
which is actually a good thing, the syncing of the mirrors is more traffic
than the few clients using those architectures.
ObBaitOfTheDay: why dont we release 3.2 with AMD64 RSN? Ubuntu has.