On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 01:31:31PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote: > > [Roberto C. Sanchez] > > > W: toshutils; Package Build-Depends on automake* or autoconf. > > > This package Build-Depends on automake* or autoconf. This is almost > > > never a good idea, as the package should run autoconf or automake on > > > the source tree before the source package is built. > > There's lots of debate about this one. If your package uses horrible > macros and kludges to make everything work, you may wish to play it > cautious and manually run the same version of autoconf upstream uses. > If it doesn't, in my view it's the responsibility of the autoconf > maintainer to ensure that what he packages doesn't break arbitrary > documented features. The big problem was autoconf 2.13 -> 2.5x, but > it's easy enough to make sure you run the correct one of those. > > automake1.x seems reasonable to depend on, since the maintainer has > provided multiple versioned packages, so you can reasonably expect the > API not to change within a single package. > The only reason I need to them is to autoreconf. I have incorporated a patch from ALT Linux that sets up thoshutils to use GTK2. It does this by modifying the configure.in to look for GTK2 instead of GTK+. Thus, the need for autoconf and automake. > > > W: toshutils; The file config.guess contains a timestamp line that is less than 2002. > > > The autoconf file shown above contains a timestamp variable that has a > > > year that is less than 2002. This means you need to update your > > > autoconf files, as the current files will make it hard for your > > > package to auto-build. > > > W: toshutils; The file config.sub contains a timestamp line that is less than 2002. > > Build-depend on autotools-dev, and copy /usr/share/misc/config.guess > and config.sub into place at build time. ln -fs also works. It's a > very light build dep, so there's not much point in patching the right > files into the source diff.gz. (However, note that if you don't want > to bloat your diff.gz you may wish to mv the old files out of the way, > and mv them back in your 'clean' target.) > OK. No problem. > > > W: toshutils; The command xmessage -timeout 10 `fan -f` listed in a menu file does not exist. > > > W: toshutils; The command xmessage -timeout 10 `fan -n` listed in a menu file does not exist. > > > W: toshutils; The command xmessage -timeout 10 `fan` listed in a menu file does not exist. > > Those seem pretty legitimate, although there's an argument to be made > that menu should provide a syntax for this type of status display, so > individual apps don't have to do it by hand. (Some window managers and > desktop environments might have alternative facilities to xmessage, > better integrated into their own weltanschauung.) I agree. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
Attachment:
pgpJhlim8hDk8.pgp
Description: PGP signature