[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RES: /usr/lib vs /usr/libexec

On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 03:38:33AM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> This just seems like change for the sake of change, with trivial benefits,
> if any.

I agree, and I admit to not having read this whole thread, but has anyone 
made a serious argument as to why we need yet another directory for non-user
executables?  It seems to me that /usr/sbin would serve just fine for this.


Reply to: