Re: RES: /usr/lib vs /usr/libexec
Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu> writes:
> I don't personally care on /usr/lib vs. /usr/libexec, except that the idea
> of going through and changing all the packages in Debian really doesn't
> appeal to me (and however easily spread that cost, it's a lot of work --
> it's more work than the /usr/doc migration, and that was a PITA). I do
> care a *lot* about consistency. Having a mix of /usr/lib and /usr/libexec
> is, in my opinion, significantly worse than either one or the other.
Most packages had files in /usr/doc. Most packages do not have files
in /usr/lib at all, and most of those that do, wouldn't need to be
changed.
Reply to: