[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RES: /usr/lib vs /usr/libexec

Brian May <bam@debian.org> writes:

>>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net> writes:
>     Thomas> We've been told that /usr is necessary to allow network
>     Thomas> sharing.  Of course, you can network share any directory,
>     Thomas> not just /usr.  If you want executables to be shared, then
>     Thomas> share /bin.  It's not a problem.  I've done it.
> If you want to share /bin, how do you run /bin/mount in order to mount
> /bin?


/bin/mount foo:whatever /bin

Just because you mount something on top of /bin does not require it to
have been empty before.

Same for /lib.


Reply to: