On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 03:02:32AM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote: > > [Kevin Mark] > > that would suggest that its the RM who has decided such issues in the > > past unilaterilly. > > Conventional wisdom is that release management involves so much > drudgery and so little recognition that the *least* we can do is let > the release manager decide on codenames and version numbers. Hi Peter, I have no difficulty with a decision being made unilaterially. I'd just prefer to have it stated <<somewhere>> so that people wont debate something like this near the end of the release cycle and so that folks who are creating dead-tree media would not have worry that things wont be in sync, which would be somewhat detrimental to Debian as not being organized and professional. cheers, Kev -- counter.li.org #238656 -- goto counter.li.org and be counted! `$' $' $ $ _ ,d$$$g$ ,d$$$b. $,d$$$b`$' g$$$$$b $,d$$b ,$P' `$ ,$P' `Y$ $$' `$ $ "' `$ $$' `$ $$ $ $$ggggg$ $ $ $ ,$P"" $ $ $ `$g. ,$$ `$$._ _. $ _,g$P $ `$b. ,$$ $ $ `Y$$P'$. `Y$$$$P $$$P"' ,$. `Y$$P'$ $. ,$.
Description: Digital signature