[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: debian sarge is 3.2 or 4 ?

[Kevin Mark]
> that would suggest that its the RM who has decided such issues in the
> past unilaterilly.

Conventional wisdom is that release management involves so much
drudgery and so little recognition that the *least* we can do is let
the release manager decide on codenames and version numbers.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: