[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: PHP/WebApp policy/mailing list

On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 10:21:30AM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> >>>If interested people would think a l.d.o list
> >>>is better, that could also be nice.
> >>
> >>Once you've got me convinced the list is a good idea, it usually doesn't
> >>take too long to create it.
> It really seems that such a list is needed, a lot of webapp maintainers 
> would be happy to have a common place to talk about that.
> Moreover, I do think that this list would have a decent lifetime, in the 
> first place, it will handle the Webapp Policy Writing but it won't 
> become useless when the policy will be written.
> Indeed, I think that it will become the right place to help maintenance 
> of webapps.
> Here is the name that sounds to be the good one, according to this thread:
>     debian-webapps@lists.debian.org
> We have to find a correct description for the list, let me give you a 
> first try:
>     Coordination for web application maintenance and Debian Webapp
>     Policy issues.
> Feel free to give here other descriptions :)

As per the list creation guidelines, I'll suggest the following, unless
anyone can improve on it:


There are now a large number of Web Application packages in and entering
Debian. At the moment, there is no policy on how to package these
This list aims to:
* Create and maintain a working policy for the packaging of Web based
  applications (Webapps).
* Provide a forum for the discussion of packaging Webapps.

Short description: 
Web Applications package maintainance and Web Application policy development

Long description:
Coordination for the maintainance of web application packages and Debian
Webapp Policy issues.


Subscription Policy:

Post Policy:

Web Archive:

Warm regards,
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li B345BDD3

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: