[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Status of 'sarge' for the amd64 architecture

On 23-Apr-05, 17:24 (CDT), Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org> wrote: 
> Beyond the fact that it is too late to add another architecture for
> sarge, removing arm from sarge does not make the mirror pulses much
> smaller - and AFAIK the size of the mirror pulses is the main problem.

See, that just makes no sense whatsover. You can claim either:

1) Adding AMD64 would increase the mirror load unacceptably


2) Removing ARM would not have a significant effect on the mirror load

but not both at the same time. (Yes, I realize that two different people
made these claims, but which one am I supposed to believe?)


Steve Greenland
    The irony is that Bill Gates claims to be making a stable operating
    system and Linus Torvalds claims to be trying to take over the
    world.       -- seen on the net

Reply to: