Re: Status of 'sarge' for the amd64 architecture

[Steve Greenland <steveg@moregruel.net>]

On 23-Apr-05, 17:24 (CDT), Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org> wrote: 
> Beyond the fact that it is too late to add another architecture for
> sarge, removing arm from sarge does not make the mirror pulses much
> smaller - and AFAIK the size of the mirror pulses is the main problem.

See, that just makes no sense whatsover. You can claim either:

1) Adding AMD64 would increase the mirror load unacceptably

OR

2) Removing ARM would not have a significant effect on the mirror load


but not both at the same time. (Yes, I realize that two different people
made these claims, but which one am I supposed to believe?)

Steve

-- 
Steve Greenland
    The irony is that Bill Gates claims to be making a stable operating
    system and Linus Torvalds claims to be trying to take over the
    world.       -- seen on the net