Re: All GPL'ed programs have to go to non-free
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 06:08:50AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> If it contained only editorial changes as you are saying, you've thereby
> proven that your statement the documentation licencing was "firmly
> decided" was wrong.
The SC ratified by SC2004-003 is abundantly clear: documentation must be
Free, according to the DFSG, and nothing short of another GR will change
that. I believe this to be obvious and self-evident. (The rest is
tangental, and this conversation has too many mini-threads, so I'm
leaving it at that.)
--
Glenn Maynard
Reply to: