[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: arm seems OK: release status?



In article <E1DKvPc-0004E1-00@calista.eckenfels.6bone.ka-ip.net> you wrote:
> I would not have a problem to stop unstable building on architectures who
> need to catch up on testing (especially since freezing testing would allow
> them to catch up).

Actually  that was a bit missworded, I mean packages "destinated for
testing" (i.e. all of them in the backlog) and hand picked new ones.

> Greetings
> Bernd



Reply to: