[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels

* Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org> [050326 08:18]:
> > > And one of the reasons for which licensing for documentation has not
> > > been discussed is that most people were not aware of the scope of the
> > > "editorial" changes, so there was no reason to discuss anything.
> > You can keep repeating that lie from now to eternity; it will not
> > cause it to become true.
> Sorry, Henning, but actually only very few people realized that these
> changes were intended to change ftp-masters behaviour.  And, if you
> re-read the discussion after Anthonys announcement of the changes,
> Marco is right here.

Well, it depends on what you mean by "scope". If you mean all the
effects on what actually happen it might be true. But if scope means
what rules it changes and what effect on documentation it has, these
are different statements. But the context says it is about discussion
about "licensing for documentation" and the quotes around editorial
also give a direct hint about what is meant...

  Bernhard R. Link

Reply to: