[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting

On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 08:38:11AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Matthias Urlichs <smurf@smurf.noris.de> writes:

> > The choice is to either restrict the required client-side fanciness to
> > what most of our mirrors are willing to accept, or go without mirrors 
> > (OK, OK ... fewer mirrors anyway), which is something I don't think we'd
> > want.

> The whole point of SCC was to go without mirrors.

*No*, the point is to not require all mirrors to carry all ports.

Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: