[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting

On Mar 19, Daniel Kobras <kobras@debian.org> wrote:

> What's wrong with splitting into ftp-full-monty.d.o, carrying all archs,
> including the popular ones, and ftp.d.o, carrying only the most popular
> subset? This way, there's no need to mirror from both of them, and
> duplication is kept to a minimum. Slightly increased traffic from the
> fullblown server is the only drawback I see compared to the ports
> proposal.
That on some servers I'd like to mirror both archives, and I'd rather
not waste a few GB on duplicated files.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: