* Peter 'p2' De Schrijver (p2@mind.be) wrote: > On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 09:27:26AM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > > Hi, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver wrote: > > > > > This is obviously unacceptable. Why would a small number of people be > > > allowed to veto inclusion of other people's work ? > > > > Why not? (Assuming they do have a valid reason. For instance, I probably > > wouldn't allow an MMIX port into the archive even if it sat up and begged.) > > Because it's not fair ? I would allow an MMIX port if it would exist and > work. Nor is it fair to lump a ton of additional work on volunteers who aren't interested in doing it. <Shrug> Were a veto to be used it'd probably be discussed a fair bit and I imagine there'd be an opportunity for someone to stand up and take up the release work for the about-to-be-veto'd arch. The problem is getting someone to actually do it. Stephen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature