Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 12:06:15PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 05:43:26PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > [1] The installer might be a point, but since all sarge architectures
> > will have a working installer and I hope there's not another
> > installer rewrite planned for etch this shouldn't be a big issue.
>
> This is still an issue. Joey Hess's mails have indicated very clearly that it's
> difficult to get an installer release out even when all arches are already
> supported.
This is a non-issue. The main problem was the kernel situation, which will be
streamlined for etch into a single package, and maybe build issues, which
could be solved by a separate build queue or priority for d-i issues.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: