hi, On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 01:39:44AM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > > also, what about the library issue? > > > Which library issue? AFAIK the packages co-exist nicely. istr trying to build gpg-agent from the upstream source but the configure script would fail because i didn't have the appropriate version of one of the gpg-related libraries. the source package seems to build debs okay though, so at least i have something to play with... however, don't you think it's a little pre-emptive to have a gnupg2 binary package when they haven't yet released gnupg version 2? this smacks of the infamous redhat gcc release... > > assuming james is okay with it and there isn't some kind of library > > dependency issue, i'd gladly sponsor a gpg-agent. > > > Umm, s/sponsor/push it through NEW already, dammit/ ;-) ah, sorry, can't help there. sean --
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature