Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Scripsit David Nusinow <david_nusinow@verizon.net>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 07:37:25PM +0000, Henning Makholm wrote:
> <snip lots of circular discussion>
Please point out what's circular about my discussion.
> Your entire argument seems to hinge on one single thing:
> "unstable-only".
Yes, because that is the part of the plan I'm objecting to.
> Is your mind really so inflexible that you can't see beyond this?
What, do I have to find multiple faults with the plan before I can
point out the one I do see?
> How about this? Try providing an alternative that actually fixes the
> problems instead of just bitching.
See reply to Steve Langasek that I just sent off.
--
Henning Makholm "This imposes the restriction on any
procedure statement that the kind and type
of each actual parameter be compatible with the
kind and type of the corresponding formal parameter."
Reply to: