Re: status of buildds?
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 08:59:55AM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
> On Tuesday, 15 Mar 2005, you wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 11:37:31PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > > > >The s390 porting team can perfectly well do what the hurd-i386 porting
> > > > >team does: build them themselves. I mean, umm, you don't have to be
> > > > >hooked into w-b to upload packages.
> > > > Why are some architectures refused the same service that others get?
> > > You have to ask w-b for that one. But regardless, which is better?
> > > Do nothing, because w-b isn't doing what s390 wants, or deal with it
> > > oneself? Instead of fighting about who should solve the problems, why
> > > not solve it?
> > It's the job of w-b admins to add new buildds in a timely manner. If they
> > don't do that, they simply fail (one significant part of) their job.
> or they just have their reasons not to do.
if so, why they don't share them with us instead of saying no?
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' email@example.com | firstname.lastname@example.org
`- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net