Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 04:27:50PM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > especially given the requirement that you need <= 2 buildds.
> I consider that requirement to be not warranted, and indeed unjustified.
I would like to hear the rationale for the requirement. Currently I
agree that it seems unjustified.
> If I had to think of a rationale for it, the only one I could think of
> would be "the architecture needs to be fast enough not to block security
> However, I consider an update whose $ARCH binaries are released a week
> later not to be a problem.
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>