Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Matthias Urlichs <smurf@smurf.noris.de> wrote:
> Hi, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
>> If scc is split into a seperate archive
>> (seperate hostname and all) and is strictly voluntary it in no way affects
>> the size or mirrors of the main archs.
>
> As I understand it, SCC *binaries* get their own domain / mirrors /
> everything, but the *source* shall be shared with the main archive.
Uh. Not if you want to distribute any GPLed material.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59-chiark.mail.debian.devel@srcf.ucam.org
Reply to: