[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting

Hi, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:

> If scc is split into a seperate archive
> (seperate hostname and all) and is strictly voluntary it in no way affects
> the size or mirrors of the main archs.

As I understand it, SCC *binaries* get their own domain / mirrors /
everything, but the *source* shall be shared with the main archive.

I assume that storing the source twice is more work for the toolchain
people, and it's obviously wasted disk space.

Matthias Urlichs   |   {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de   |  smurf@smurf.noris.de

Reply to: