Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Hi, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> If scc is split into a seperate archive
> (seperate hostname and all) and is strictly voluntary it in no way affects
> the size or mirrors of the main archs.
As I understand it, SCC *binaries* get their own domain / mirrors /
everything, but the *source* shall be shared with the main archive.
I assume that storing the source twice is more work for the toolchain
people, and it's obviously wasted disk space.
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | smurf@smurf.noris.de
Reply to: