Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 01:51:02PM -0300, Humberto Massa wrote:
> Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> >With a decent toolset, doing a security package for 10 architectures
> >should be a nearly-constant amount of work, no matter which base the
> >number 10 is written in.
> Speaking of which, can anyone here explain to me why does a two-line
> security fix on, say, KDE, makes things need to be recompiled for 12
> days long? (!!!) One could think that there are more incremental ways of
> dealing with recompilation of enourmous packages.
Not currently supported, and not really considered as a technical solution.