Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Scripsit David Schmitt <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> On Monday 14 March 2005 12:05, Robert Lemmen wrote:
>> - there must be a way for a scc arch to get a stable release. why don't
>> we either keep testing for scc archs but not do releases, so the
>> porters can do their own stable releases of their arch or have
>> per-arch testing? (the latter might lead to a source package explosion
>> i think)
> AFAI can tell, anybody can host an archive of packages built from stable
> sources for a scc or unofficial port.
"Unofficial" is the word. Essentially you are asking the
unter-architectures to spilt off and form their own organization
separate from Debian.
> If on the other hand nobody can be found to recompile packages after
> DSAs are released for this arch, I believe the arch shouldn't be
> released for Debian as stable.
But there are several other reasons why the current dictum would
prevent an architecture from providing stable packages.
Henning Makholm "Gå ud i solen eller regnen, smil, køb en ny trøje,
slå en sludder af med købmanden, puds dine støvler. Lev!"