[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting



On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 03:24:06PM +0100, Aurélien Jarno wrote:
> Sven Luther a écrit :
> >On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 02:38:01PM +0100, Aurélien Jarno wrote:
> >
> >>Sven Luther a écrit :
> >>
> >>>- Not having slower arches hold up testing. 
> >>
> >>Slower arches don't hold up testing. Arches with buildd not well managed 
> >>do.
> >
> >
> >Ok, drop this argument, but what do you think of the rest of the proposal 
> >? 
> I totally disagree with it. The current proposal (or even decision?), is 
> like cutting the leg when only one toe is affected.

Err, we are speaking of my proposal to build tier 2 arches from testing, not
the one proposed by the vancouver meeting team.

> What about partial mirroring to address space problems? What about a 
> team for wanna-build so that help and machines are not refused anymore? 
> What about a team for buildd so that there is always an admin available 
> at a given time?
> 
> Maybe it doesn't work, but at least we have to try, before dropping 
> arches. Because it's clear that SCC arches will be dropped sooner or 
> later, if they are considered by debian-developers as "secondary arches".

Ok, i agree with you.

Friendly,

Sven Luther



Reply to: