Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 01:51:28PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 11:10:36AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > pcc is barely at 98%. I don't think that barrier should be that high. We
> > *should* at last release with the tree most important archs: i386, amd64,
> > powerpc.
> powerpc is clearly a release architecture; the question is whether it
> goes on ftp.d.o or scc.d.o. There's a point of view that says that
> committing to release powerpc from scc.d.o means that we're committed to
> making sure that we *can* release architectures from scc.d.o, which is a
> good thing ...
That means that only x86 and amd64 are going to be tier one arches ? That is
worse that what was even in the announcement, and i hope i misunderstood this.