Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting

[Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>]

Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Am Montag, 14. März 2005 08:36 schrieb Steve Langasek:
>> wanna-build stats:
>>   i386:         99.83% up-to-date,  99.83% if also counting uploaded pkgs
>>   ia64:         97.39% up-to-date,  97.41% if also counting uploaded pkgs
>>   powerpc:      97.99% up-to-date,  98.00% if also counting uploaded pkgs
>>
>> [curious that ia64 is lower than some others right now -- when we looked
>> last week, it was above 98%, so maybe etch would have a *different* 4
>> architectures. ;)]
>
> where we see that two of the most important archs in that list (i386, ppc).
>
> pcc is barely at 98%. I don't think that barrier should be that high. We 
> *should* at last release with the tree most important archs: i386, amd64, 
> powerpc.

goswin-guest@haydn:~/archive/pure64$ wanna-build/wb-cmd status
      Known packages:    8931 (   9027)	
  Installed packages:    8743
Needs-build packages:       0
   Dep-Wait packages:      50		<- lots on !amd64 or non-free
     Broken packages:      59		<- should be in p-a-s till ported
 Not-For-Us packages:      96		<- will not be ported, p-a-s
   Building packages:       1
      1 fschueler-guest
  Uploading packages:       7
      7 fschueler-guest
     Failed packages:      71
     71 fschueler-guest

Total for amd64 should be: 8931 - 59 - 96 == 8776
Packages total up-to-date: 8743 / 8931    == 98.895% (~ what buildd.d.o shows)
Packages up-to-date      : 8743 / 8776    == 99.623% (what buildd.d.o says it shows)

Amd64 easily makes the 98% line.

MfG
        Goswin