[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Edge and multi-arch (was Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting)

On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 12:18:33PM +0000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no> [2005-03-14 13:10]:
> > | I have yet to see a proposal how to do multiarch in the right way.
> > What is lacking in the proposals out there?
> The following is what I (as DPL) sent to the release people in January
> to get them to discuss these issues.  I didn't post this to a list
> because what I wrote is kinda rough and I wanted the release people to
> clarify and post it.  Since this hasn't happened yet, I might just as
> well post my original message.  But please note that some important
> things might be missing in it.
> Basically, there has been a lot of discussions about multi-arch and
> some people seem to think that after sarge we'll _obviously_ move to
> multi-arch.  Well, this is not so obvious to me.  In particular, I see
> no consensus among ftpmaster/archive people, release people, toolchain
> people, porters, and basically everyone else that this is the way to

Well, there is no clear consensus about what debian is and should be in the
future among these people to start with, so ...


Sven Luther

Reply to: